U.L. Coleman Co. v. Gosslee

240 So. 3d 180
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 16, 2018·No. No. 2018–C–0239·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

*181I would grant this writ, for the well-articulated reasons assigned by Judge Brown and Judge Bleich in their dissents in the court of appeal. Specifically, it is clear that U.L. Coleman and Keitha Dickson Gosslee had a complex and evolving-or devolving-professional relationship. The trial judge adroitly evaluated and analyzed the evidence, making credibility determinations of the principals of this matter, Coleman and Gosslee, and made detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law. In my view, there was abundant evidence to support the trial judge's conclusion in light of the testimony. I would therefore grant this writ and reinstate the trial court's judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

U.L. Coleman Co. v. Gosslee, 240 So. 3d 180 (La. 2018).

240 So. 3d 180 (U.L. Coleman Co. v. Gosslee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bucks v. DirecTECH Southwest
266 So. 3d 467 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2019)
Knight v. Tucker
263 So. 3d 625 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2019)