U.L. Coleman Co. v. Gosslee

240 So. 3d 180
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 16, 2018
DocketNo. 2018–C–0239
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 240 So. 3d 180 (U.L. Coleman Co. v. Gosslee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
U.L. Coleman Co. v. Gosslee, 240 So. 3d 180 (La. 2018).

Opinion

*181I would grant this writ, for the well-articulated reasons assigned by Judge Brown and Judge Bleich in their dissents in the court of appeal. Specifically, it is clear that U.L. Coleman and Keitha Dickson Gosslee had a complex and evolving-or devolving-professional relationship. The trial judge adroitly evaluated and analyzed the evidence, making credibility determinations of the principals of this matter, Coleman and Gosslee, and made detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law. In my view, there was abundant evidence to support the trial judge's conclusion in light of the testimony. I would therefore grant this writ and reinstate the trial court's judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bucks v. DirecTECH Southwest
266 So. 3d 467 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2019)
Knight v. Tucker
263 So. 3d 625 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 So. 3d 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ul-coleman-co-v-gosslee-la-2018.