Uhlfelder v. Uhlfelder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Uhlfelder v. Uhlfelder

266 A.D.2d 388, 697 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11532

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 A.D.2d 388 (Uhlfelder v. Uhlfelder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Uhlfelder v. Uhlfelder, 266 A.D.2d 388, 697 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11532 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered October 3, 1996, the defendant former husband appeals from an order, denominated a judgment, of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), entered September 17, 1998, which denied his motion to set aside a stipulation of settlement upon his default in appearing at a continuation of a hearing on the motion.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

No appeal lies from an order or judgment entered upon the default of the appealing party (see, Beck v Beck, 257 AD2d 641). Bracken, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered October 3, 1996, the defendant former husband appeals from an order, denominated a judgment, of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), entered September 17, 1998, which denied his motion to set aside a stipulation of settlement upon his default in appearing at a continuation of a hearing on the motion.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

No appeal lies from an order or judgment entered upon the default of the appealing party (see, Beck v Beck, 257 AD2d 641). Bracken, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 388, 697 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uhlfelder-v-uhlfelder-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack