Uhler v. Ryer

New York Court of Common Pleas

Uhler v. Ryer

4 N.Y.S. 834, 23 N.Y. St. Rep. 630, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1741

DecidedApril 1, 1889

StatusPublished

This text of 4 N.Y.S. 834 (Uhler v. Ryer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Uhler v. Ryer, 4 N.Y.S. 834, 23 N.Y. St. Rep. 630, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1741 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Daly, J.

The moving party does not bring himself within the rule as to rearguments laid down in Curley v. Tomlinson, 5 Daly, 283. The question as to the appealability of the order of the general term of the city court was the principal question before our general term. The appellant was advised by the opinion written in the city court, and printed in his own case, of that very question, and he had ample opportunity to be heard upon it. Motion denied, with ©10 costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daly, J.

The moving party does not bring himself within the rule as to rearguments laid down in Curley v. Tomlinson, 5 Daly, 283. The question as to the appealability of the order of the general term of the city court was the principal question before our general term. The appellant was advised by the opinion written in the city court, and printed in his own case, of that very question, and he had ample opportunity to be heard upon it. Motion denied, with ©10 costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 N.Y.S. 834, 23 N.Y. St. Rep. 630, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uhler-v-ryer-nyctcompl-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack