Home/The Superior Court of New York City/Uhlenhaut v. Manhattan Railway Co.

Uhlenhaut v. Manhattan Railway Co.

28 Jones & S. 501, 60 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 501
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedApril 11, 1892
StatusPublished

This text of 28 Jones & S. 501 (Uhlenhaut v. Manhattan Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Uhlenhaut v. Manhattan Railway Co., 28 Jones & S. 501, 60 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 501 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Opinion

The trial judge directed each of defendants’ proposed findings to be marked “ refused except so far as covered by the findings of fact and conclusions of law settled and signed by me.” The general term held that this was not prejudicial error requiring reversal. Opinion by Dugro, J.; Sedgwick, Ch. J. and Gildersleeve, J., concurred. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Jones & S. 501, 60 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uhlenhaut-v-manhattan-railway-co-nysuperctnyc-1892.