Uhlenhaut v. Manhattan Railway Co.

28 Jones & S. 501, 60 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 501
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided April 11, 1892·Published

Opinion

The trial judge directed each of defendants’ proposed findings to be marked refused except so far as covered by the findings of fact and conclusions of law settled and signed by me.” The general term held that this was not prejudicial error requiring reversal. Opinion by Dugro, J.; Sedgwick, Ch. J. and Gildersleeve, J., concurred. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Uhlenhaut v. Manhattan Railway Co., 28 Jones & S. 501, 60 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 501 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

28 Jones & S. 501 (Uhlenhaut v. Manhattan Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.