Uhle v. Burnham

42 F. 1, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 2097
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedApril 14, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 42 F. 1 (Uhle v. Burnham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Uhle v. Burnham, 42 F. 1, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 2097 (circtsdny 1890).

Opinion

Lacombe, J.

It seems unnecessary to add anything to tbe full discussion of the questions raised on this motion which will be found in [2]*2Kansas City, etc., Ry. Co. v. Interstate Lumber Co., 37 Fed. Rep. 3, (by Judge Brewer,) and Burck v. Taylor, 39 Fed. Rep. 581, (by Judge Maxey.) The motion to remand is denied. See, also, First Nat. Bank v. Merchants’ Bank, 37 Fed. Rep. 657.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. City of Dexter v. Gordon
158 S.W. 683 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1913)
Sagara v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
189 F. 220 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado, 1911)
Illinois Central R. R. v. Whitworth
73 S.W. 766 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1903)
Foulk v. Gray
120 F. 156 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia, 1902)
Whitworth v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.
107 F. 557 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky, 1901)
Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Sundry Ins. Cos.
108 F. 451 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina, 1901)
Alley v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.
64 F. 903 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 F. 1, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 2097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uhle-v-burnham-circtsdny-1890.