Uhl v. Town of Lantana
This text of 190 So. 2d 753 (Uhl v. Town of Lantana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date of April 22, 1966.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rules, rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
It is further ordered that the petitioner’s petition for allowance of attorneys’ fees, be and the same is hereby denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 So. 2d 753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uhl-v-town-of-lantana-fla-1966.