Uhl v. . International Railway Company
108 N.E. 1109, 214 N.Y. 615, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1280
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, Cardozo and Seabury, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Uhl v. . International Railway Company, 108 N.E. 1109, 214 N.Y. 615, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1280 (N.Y. 1915).
108 N.E. 1109 (Uhl v. . International Railway Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hartell v. T. H. Simonson & Son Co.
113 N.E. 255 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)