Uhl v. International Railway Co.
162 A.D. 929, 147 N.Y.S. 1146
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1914
StatusPublished
This text of 162 A.D. 929 (Uhl v. International Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Uhl v. International Railway Co., 162 A.D. 929, 147 N.Y.S. 1146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that under the rule of law charged by the trial judge no negligence was shown entitling the plaintiff to recover.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
162 A.D. 929, 147 N.Y.S. 1146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uhl-v-international-railway-co-nyappdiv-1914.