UGO COLOMBO v. DACRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
This text of UGO COLOMBO v. DACRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (UGO COLOMBO v. DACRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 7, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-277 Lower Tribunal No. 18-41649 ________________
Ugo Colombo, et al., Appellants,
vs.
Dacra Development, Corporation, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael A. Hanzman, Judge.
Coffey Burlington, P.L., and Jeffrey B. Crockett; Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A., Thomas E. Scott, and Daryl Greenberg, for appellants.
Kula & Associates, P.A., Elliot B. Kula and William D. Mueller; Richard and Richard, P.A., and Dennis Richard, for appellees.
Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Phillips v. Garcia, 147 So. 3d 569 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)
(Recognizing that the trial court is in a superior position to determine whether
the party or its counsel knew or should have known that the claim or defense
asserted was not supported by the facts or the applicable law and concluding
that the appellate court will reverse only if the record reflects that no
reasonable trial judge could have denied the motion for sanctions under
Florida Statute 57.105.).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
UGO COLOMBO v. DACRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ugo-colombo-v-dacra-development-corporation-fladistctapp-2021.