UGO COLOMBO v. DACRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 7, 2021·No. 20-0277·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed April 7, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D20-277

Lower Tribunal No. 18-41649

Ugo Colombo, et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

Dacra Development, Corporation, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael A.

Hanzman, Judge.

Coffey Burlington, P.L., and Jeffrey B. Crockett; Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A., Thomas E. Scott, and Daryl Greenberg, for appellants.

Kula & Associates, P.A., Elliot B. Kula and William D. Mueller; Richard and Richard, P.A., and Dennis Richard, for appellees.

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Phillips v. Garcia, 147 So. 3d 569 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)

(Recognizing that the trial court is in a superior position to determine whether the party or its counsel knew or should have known that the claim or defense asserted was not supported by the facts or the applicable law and concluding that the appellate court will reverse only if the record reflects that no reasonable trial judge could have denied the motion for sanctions under Florida Statute 57.105.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UGO COLOMBO v. DACRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

UGO COLOMBO v. DACRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (UGO COLOMBO v. DACRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phillips v. Garcia
147 So. 3d 569 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)