Uglio v. Cavallo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Uglio v. Cavallo

258 A.D. 770, 14 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6814

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 6, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 770 (Uglio v. Cavallo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Uglio v. Cavallo, 258 A.D. 770, 14 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

By consent of the parties it was stipulated, in open court, that the Hon. Gilbert D. B. Hasbrouck, official referee, be appointed to hear, try and determine the issues in the case. That the plaintiff should be ready for trial at the date fixed by Judge Hasbrouck; that the order denying the temporary injunction should be reversed, and an injunction granted which required the defendants not to obstruct the visible right of way, and that a gate or bars shall be erected at the intersection of the right of way with the public highway; that the plaintiffs, or their agents, in using the right of way, shall close the gate or bars after passing through; that costs of this appeal shall abide the event of the trial. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By consent of the parties it was stipulated, in open court, that the Hon. Gilbert D. B. Hasbrouck, official referee, be appointed to hear, try and determine the issues in the case. That the plaintiff should be ready for trial at the date fixed by Judge Hasbrouck; that the order denying the temporary injunction should be reversed, and an injunction granted which required the defendants not to obstruct the visible right of way, and that a gate or bars shall be erected at the intersection of the right of way with the public highway; that the plaintiffs, or their agents, in using the right of way, shall close the gate or bars after passing through; that costs of this appeal shall abide the event of the trial. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 770, 14 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uglio-v-cavallo-nyappdiv-1939.