Uffelman v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
98 A. 574, 253 Pa. 394, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 854
Opinion
This judgment is affirmed for the reasons given by the learned trial judge for entering the nonsuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Uffelman v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 98 A. 574, 253 Pa. 394, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 854 (Pa. 1916).
98 A. 574 (Uffelman v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tucker Et Vir. v. Pgh. Railways Co.
33 A.2d 441 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Coyle v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.
27 A.2d 533 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)
Smith Et Ux. v. Pittsburghi Rys. Co.
171 A. 879 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
Iszard Et Ux. v. P.R.T. Co.
100 Pa. Super. 240 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Harkins v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
133 A. 376 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Zieger v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
84 Pa. Super. 541 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Crawford v. Reading Transit & Light Co.
116 A. 542 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Delaney v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Railway Co.
109 A. 605 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Gould v. Atlantic City Railroad
68 Pa. Super. 431 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Diffenderfer v. Pennsylvania Railroad
67 Pa. Super. 187 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Fornwalt v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
65 Pa. Super. 559 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)