Ueland v. Hibbard

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Ueland v. Hibbard

33 Misc. 744, 67 N.Y.S. 218

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 33 Misc. 744 (Ueland v. Hibbard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ueland v. Hibbard, 33 Misc. 744, 67 N.Y.S. 218 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As the plaintiff did not plead the law of Minnesota, and the defendant in defense pleaded that it was a certain way, the issue raised was as to whether the law of Minnesota was as the defendant alleged or not. The plaintiff was not thereunder entitled to prove what the law of Minnesota was, except for the purpose of showing that it was not as alleged by the defendant. The plaintiff had not, therefore, the right to show that the defendant was, according to the Minnesota law, a joint maker.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Present: Tbuax, P. J., Soott and Dugbo, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

As the plaintiff did not plead the law of Minnesota, and the defendant in defense pleaded that it was a certain way, the issue raised was as to whether the law of Minnesota was as the defendant alleged or not. The plaintiff was not thereunder entitled to prove what the law of Minnesota was, except for the purpose of showing that it was not as alleged by the defendant. The plaintiff had not, therefore, the right to show that the defendant was, according to the Minnesota law, a joint maker.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Present: Tbuax, P. J., Soott and Dugbo, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Misc. 744, 67 N.Y.S. 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ueland-v-hibbard-nyappterm-1900.