Ueberweg v. La Compagnie Generale Transatlantique
This text of 67 F. 617 (Ueberweg v. La Compagnie Generale Transatlantique) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(after stating the facts). If the libel-ant had prevailed in the district court, he would have been allowed interest from the date of expenditure, not from the date of master’s report, and that, too, although he might have claimed more than the master gave him, or the master might have allowed some items which the court subsequently rejected. For reasons before stated, he cannot recover interest, when his failure to produce all available proof in the district court postponed his recovery. But that consideration ceases to be controlling when the proof is made complete and the case decided. Interest should run from the date of filing the mandate, May 21, 1894.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 F. 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ueberweg-v-la-compagnie-generale-transatlantique-circtedny-1895.