Uebel v. Weinshtein

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Uebel v. Weinshtein

288 S.W.2d 344, 1956 Ky. LEXIS 253

Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided March 16, 1956·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, L. J. Uebel, has moved for an appeal from a judgment on a verdict in the sum of $975 in favor of appellee on a promissory note. The record reveals that it was stipulated by the parties before trial [345] that the only issue to be tried was the question as to whether or not the note was given in payment of a gambling debt. After hearing the evidence, the court submitted the issue to the jury under a proper instruction, who found for appellee.

A consideration of the record and of the points raised fails to disclose any error which we consider prejudicial to appellant’s substantial rights.

The motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, L. J. Uebel, has moved for an appeal from a judgment on a verdict in the sum of $975 in favor of appellee on a promissory note. The record reveals that it was stipulated by the parties before trial [345] that the only issue to be tried was the question as to whether or not the note was given in payment of a gambling debt. After hearing the evidence, the court submitted the issue to the jury under a proper instruction, who found for appellee.

A consideration of the record and of the points raised fails to disclose any error which we consider prejudicial to appellant’s substantial rights.

The motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Uebel v. Weinshtein, 288 S.W.2d 344, 1956 Ky. LEXIS 253 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

288 S.W.2d 344 (Uebel v. Weinshtein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.