(UD)(PS) JMK Investments, Inc. v. Porter

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JMK Investments, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-02170-KJM-AC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 Vv. 14 Isaiah Porter, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 This action is remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of 18 | Sacramento. Defendant has not established that the state court could not enforce his rights. See 19 | U.S. Bank Nat. Ass’n v. Azam, 582 F. App’x 710 (9th Cir. 2014) (unpublished) (affirming remand 20 | for lack of removal jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1)); Patel v. Del Del Taco, Inc., 446 F.3d 21 | 996, 999 (9th Cir. 2006) (summarizing and applying relevant legal test), abrogated on other 22 | grounds by BP P.L.C. v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 141 S. Ct. 1532 (2021). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 DATED: October 5, 2023. / □ 25 CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE