(UD)(PS) JMK Investments, Inc. v. Porter

E.D. California

(UD)(PS) JMK Investments, Inc. v. Porter

District Court, E.D. California·Decided October 5, 2023·No. 2:23-cv-02170·Unknown

Opinion

JMK Investments, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-02170-KJM-AC Plaintiff, ORDER Vv. Isaiah Porter, et al., 1S Defendants. This action is remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sacramento. Defendant has not established that the state court could not enforce his rights. See U.S. Bank Nat. Ass’n v. Azam, 582 F. App’x 710 (9th Cir. 2014) (unpublished) (affirming remand for lack of removal jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1)); Patel v. Del Del Taco, Inc., 446 F.3d 996, 999 (9th Cir. 2006) (summarizing and applying relevant legal test), abrogated on other grounds by BP P.L.C. v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 141 S. Ct. 1532 (2021). DATED: October 5, 2023. / □ CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JMK Investments, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-02170-KJM-AC Plaintiff, ORDER Vv. Isaiah Porter, et al., 1S Defendants. This action is remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sacramento. Defendant has not established that the state court could not enforce his rights. See U.S. Bank Nat. Ass’n v. Azam, 582 F. App’x 710 (9th Cir. 2014) (unpublished) (affirming remand for lack of removal jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1)); Patel v. Del Del Taco, Inc., 446 F.3d 996, 999 (9th Cir. 2006) (summarizing and applying relevant legal test), abrogated on other grounds by BP P.L.C. v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 141 S. Ct. 1532 (2021). DATED: October 5, 2023. / □ CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

(UD)(PS) JMK Investments, Inc. v. Porter, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Pincite

(UD)(PS) JMK Investments, Inc. v. Porter ((UD)(PS) JMK Investments, Inc. v. Porter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related