Udell Manufacturing Co. v. Perkins
This text of 163 A.D. 973 (Udell Manufacturing Co. v. Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It does not appear on the face of the complaint in this action that another action is pending between the same parties for the same cause of action. The mere fact that the demurring party produced a witness on the trial of an issue of law, to prove over objection that another action is pending between the same parties, is so incongruous with the specified cause of demurrer that the interlocutory judgment of the City Court of Yonkers must be reversed, with costs and disbursements, and the demurrer overruled, with ten dollars costs, with leave to defendant to answer within twenty days on payment of the costs of this appeal, as well as the motion costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 A.D. 973, 148 N.Y.S. 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/udell-manufacturing-co-v-perkins-nyappdiv-1914.