Uddin v. Rock Arch & Eng Corp.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJanuary 5, 2023
Docket1:21-cv-10900
StatusUnknown

This text of Uddin v. Rock Arch & Eng Corp. (Uddin v. Rock Arch & Eng Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Uddin v. Rock Arch & Eng Corp., (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NABILA UDDIN, Plaintiff, -v.- ROCK ARCH & ENG CORP. a/k/a 21 Civ. 10900 (KPF) Rock Architecture P.C., MUHAMMED ORDER ‘MARCO’ MAHAYSIN, individually, RAMI TAHA, individually, and LCS RESTORATION CORP a/k/a LCS Restoration Group, LLC. Defendants. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the parties’ stipulation of voluntary dismissal of Plaintiff’s federal claims and proposed order remanding the case to New York State Supreme Court, County of Queens, for resolution of the remaining state law claims. (Dkt. #32). Having reviewed that stipulation and good cause appearing, the Court orders as follows: 1. The Parties’ stipulation is approved; 2. Plaintiff’s federal causes of action arising under Title VII are dismissed with prejudice and all parties shall bear their own attorney’s fees and costs in connection with Plaintiff’s dismissed Title VII claims; and 3. Having found that the Court no longer has original jurisdiction over this matter, and given the early stage of this litigation, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s remaining causes of action arising under New York State and City Law, and remands the case to New York State Supreme Court, County of Queens. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) ([t]he district courts may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction ... if ... (3) the district court has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction”); cf. Valencia ex rel. Franco v. Lee, 316 F.3d 299, 306, 308 (2d Cir. 2003) (finding that the district court’s exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims where federal claims had been dismissed at an early stage of the litigation was an abuse of discretion) (collecting cases). The Clerk of Court is directed to remand the case to New York State Supreme Court, Queens County. SO ORDERED. eee” New York, New York Kathir: Palle (Zuho- KATHERINE POLK FAILLA □ United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Uddin v. Rock Arch & Eng Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uddin-v-rock-arch-eng-corp-nysd-2023.