Udac v. Takata Corporation
This text of Udac v. Takata Corporation (Udac v. Takata Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 2B328
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAFI
DASON UDAC and GWENDOLYN N. UDAC, TruStee for the Alfredo Udac Revocable Livinq Truet, Petitioner3/Plaintiffs~Appellees/CrosS~AppellantS
vs. d §:¢; faa
§§ TAKATA CORPORATION, ReSpondent/Defendant~i §§ M% Appellant/CroSS-Appellee 5 ng §§ HAWAI: M@T@Rs, :Nc., D@f@ndant ‘€*? z:¢i §
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CIV. NO. O2~l-O260)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Acoba, J., for the courtU The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on December 7, 2009 by Petitioners/Plaintiffs-AppelleeS/CrosS- AppellantS DaS0n Udac and Gwendolyn N. Udac, TruStee for the Aflredo Udac Revocable Livinq TruSt, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, HawaiUq January 21, 20lO. FOR THE COURT:
Associate JuStice
Dwayne S. Lerma &
Jo Anne Goya (Lerma & Goya); Steve K. HiSaka & Gail Y. CoSgroVe (HiSaka YoShida & CoSqrove); and Jeffrey L. Fisher (Davis
1 Considered by: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Ac0ba, Duffy, and Circuit
Court B0rder in place of Recktenwald, J., recused.
wright Tremaine LLP) (admirted pro hac vioe) for petitionerS/ plaintiffS~appelleeS/ croSS~appellantS.
No. 2832S, Udac v. Takata Coro., Order Rejecting Application for Writ of Certiorari
_2__
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Udac v. Takata Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/udac-v-takata-corporation-haw-2010.