Uchechukwu Diogu Ukariwe v. State
This text of Uchechukwu Diogu Ukariwe v. State (Uchechukwu Diogu Ukariwe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered August 16, 2019
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00950-CR
UCHECHUKWU DIOGU UKARIWE, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F17-76605-Q
ORDER On June 20, 2019, the trial court adjudicated appellant’s guilt for terroristic threat and
assessed punishment at five years in prison. Appellant’s pro se notice of appeal, postmarked
July 22, 2019, was filed in the trial court on July 30, 2019 and in this Court on August 12, 2019.
Absent a motion for new trial, a notice of appeal in a criminal case must be filed in the
trial court within 30 days after the day sentence is imposed in open court. TEX. R. APP. P.
26.2(a)(1). A document received within ten days after the filing deadline is considered timely
filed if (1) it was sent to the proper clerk by United States Postal Service (2) in an envelope
properly addressed and stamped and (3) it was deposited in the mail on or before the last day for
filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.2(b). Appellant’s notice of appeal was due thirty days after the trial court’s June 20, 2019
judgment—July 20, 2019. That day, however, was a Saturday; therefore, appellant’s notice of
appeal was due July 22, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a). And because appellant mailed his
notice of appeal to the trial court in a properly addressed and stamped envelope that was
postmarked July 22, 2019, his notice of appeal was timely filed when received on July 30, 2019.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.2(b); see also Campbell v. State, 320 S.W.3d 338, 342 (Tex. Crim. App.
2010) (the “prisoner mailbox rule” provides that a pro se prisoner is deemed to have filed his
properly addressed notice of appeal at the time it is delivered to the appropriate prison authorities
for forwarding to the clerk of the convicting court).
We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant is
entitled to court-appointed counsel in this appeal. If the trial court finds that appellant is entitled
to court-appointed counsel, we ORDER the trial court to appoint an attorney to represent
appellant in the appeal. If the trial court finds that appellant is not entitled to court-appointed
counsel, the trial court shall determine whether appellant will retain counsel to represent him in
the appeal and, if so, the name, State Bar number, and contact information for retained counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the hearing, including findings of fact,
any orders, and any supporting documentation, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date
of this order.
We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with the order. The appeal will
be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever
is earlier.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Uchechukwu Diogu Ukariwe v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uchechukwu-diogu-ukariwe-v-state-texapp-2019.