Uche v. Montgomery Hospice, Inc.

599 F. App'x 97
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 7, 2015
DocketNo. 14-2154
StatusPublished

This text of 599 F. App'x 97 (Uche v. Montgomery Hospice, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Uche v. Montgomery Hospice, Inc., 599 F. App'x 97 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maureen Uche appeals the district court’s order dismissing her case pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37 and several other orders. We have considered the claims raised in Uche’s informal brief and conclude that the district court committed no error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Uche v. Montgomery Hospice, Inc., No. 8:13-cv-00878-ELH, 2014 WL 5113588 (D.Md. Oct. 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
599 F. App'x 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uche-v-montgomery-hospice-inc-ca4-2015.