Ucci v. Mancini

114 R.I. 949
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ucci v. Mancini. Read the opinion of the Court — 115 R.I. 182
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided April 24, 1975·No. Appeal No. 73-77·Published

Opinion

Plaintiff prevailed in Superior Court on her complaint, while the defendants’ counterclaim was denied. Two separate judgments were entered. One ordered specific performance and the other denied the counterclaim. The case is not ripe for appeal because the litigation involved multiple claims and there has been no compliance with the provisions of Super. R. Civ. P. 54(b). See Kolc v. Maratta, 113 R. I. 160, 319 A.2d 14 (1974); Menzies v. Sigma Pi Alumni Ass’n, 110 R. I. 488, 294 A.2d 193 (1972). Accordingly, the case is remanded for entry of a proper judgment. Thereafter, the defendants may file their appeal and the case shall then be returned to Supreme Court where the appeal will be considered without the necessity of further briefing or arguments.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ucci v. Mancini, 114 R.I. 949 (R.I. 1975).

114 R.I. 949 (Ucci v. Mancini) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Menzies v. Sigma Pi Alumni Ass'n of Rhode Island
294 A.2d 193 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1972)
Kolc v. Maratta
319 A.2d 14 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1974)