Ucagco, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Ucagco, Inc. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1002, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2855

United States Customs Court·Decided February 20, 1968·No. No. P68/79; protests 62/4397, etc. (Philadelphia)·Published

Opinion

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “D” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), and that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist [1003]*1003of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “D” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), and that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist [1003]*1003of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Ucagco, Inc. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1002, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2855 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

60 Cust. Ct. 1002 (Ucagco, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related