U.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

U.C. v. State

719 So. 2d 379, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13421, 1998 WL 765015

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 21, 1998·No. No. 98-180·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In F.A.T. v. State, 690 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), the First District held that public school attendance records, including records of absences, are protected from disclosure. § 228.093(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (1997). Although this privilege is subject to certain exceptions, none are applicable to this case. In the instant case, however, the juvenile waived this privilege when he informed the trial court that he had failed to attend school. Accordingly, we affirm the trial [380] court’s order finding the juvenile in indirect criminal contempt.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In F.A.T. v. State, 690 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), the First District held that public school attendance records, including records of absences, are protected from disclosure. § 228.093(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (1997). Although this privilege is subject to certain exceptions, none are applicable to this case. In the instant case, however, the juvenile waived this privilege when he informed the trial court that he had failed to attend school. Accordingly, we affirm the trial [380] court’s order finding the juvenile in indirect criminal contempt.

Affirmed.

U.C. v. State, 719 So. 2d 379, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13421, 1998 WL 765015 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

719 So. 2d 379 (U.C. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related