Ubiles v. Rosenzweig Lumber Corp.
225 A.D.2d 468, 639 N.Y.2d 383, 639 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3184
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 26, 1996·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Since plaintiff suffered a substantial permanent partial loss of the use of his dominant hand and arm, impairing his ability to pursue his occupation, and continuing to cause incidents of severe pain, the monetary award does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (CPLR 5501 [c]). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ubiles v. Rosenzweig Lumber Corp., 225 A.D.2d 468, 639 N.Y.2d 383, 639 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3184 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 468 (Ubiles v. Rosenzweig Lumber Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Powell v. New York City Tr. Auth.
2025 NY Slip Op 32023(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2025)
Rojas v. New York City Tr. Auth.
2019 NY Slip Op 7430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Biejanov v. Guttman
34 A.D.3d 710 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Vertsberger v. City of New York
34 A.D.3d 453 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Geressy v. Digital Equipment Corp.
980 F. Supp. 640 (E.D. New York, 1997)