Home/Ninth Circuit/Ubay (Mateo B., Crispina) v. County of Los Angeles, Bruington (Arthur E.), Haile (Howard), Russell (k.v.), Baright (Howard), Lumbert (Frank), Parsons (Robert C.),barr (Hubert), Does I Thru L

Ubay (Mateo B., Crispina) v. County of Los Angeles, Bruington (Arthur E.), Haile (Howard), Russell (k.v.), Baright (Howard), Lumbert (Frank), Parsons (Robert C.),barr (Hubert), Does I Thru L

831 F.2d 303, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 14339
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 26, 1987·No. 85-6254·Published

Opinion

831 F.2d 303

Ubay (Mateo B., Crispina)
v.
County of Los Angeles, Bruington (Arthur E.), Haile
(Howard), Russell (K.V.), Baright (Howard),
Lumbert (Frank), Parsons (Robert
C.),Barr (Hubert), Does I thru L

NO. 85-6254

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

OCT 26, 1987

Appeal From: C.D.Cal.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ubay (Mateo B., Crispina) v. County of Los Angeles, Bruington (Arthur E.), Haile (Howard), Russell (k.v.), Baright (Howard), Lumbert (Frank), Parsons (Robert C.),barr (Hubert), Does I Thru L, 831 F.2d 303, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 14339 (9th Cir. 1987).

831 F.2d 303 (Ubay (Mateo B., Crispina) v. County of Los Angeles, Bruington (Arthur E.), Haile (Howard), Russell (k.v.), Baright (Howard), Lumbert (Frank), Parsons (Robert C.),barr (Hubert), Does I Thru L) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.