Uaw v. Nino Erwin Green
This text of Uaw v. Nino Erwin Green (Uaw v. Nino Erwin Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
October 11, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman 147700(34) Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, Justices
UAW, UAW LOCAL 6000, MICHIGAN CORRECTIONS ORGANIZATION SEIU LOCAL 526, MICHIGAN PUBLIC EMPLOYEES SEIU LOCAL 517M, and MICHIGAN STATE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION AFSCME LOCAL 5, Plaintiffs-Appellants, SC: 147700 v COA: 314781
NINO ERWIN GREEN, EDWARD D. CALLAGHAN, ROBERT LABRANT, GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, and ATTORNEY GENERAL, Defendants-Appellees. ______________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Civil Service Commission to participate in this matter as amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus curiae brief submitted by the Civil Service Commission on October 4, 2013, for the Court’s consideration in deciding the leave application is accepted for filing. On further order, the motion of the Civil Service Commission to participate in oral argument is DENIED without prejudice to filing a new motion if the matter is scheduled for oral argument.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 11, 2013 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Uaw v. Nino Erwin Green, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uaw-v-nino-erwin-green-mich-2013.