U. v. Dist. Ct. (State Dep't of Family Serv.'s)
This text of U. v. Dist. Ct. (State Dep't of Family Serv.'s) (U. v. Dist. Ct. (State Dep't of Family Serv.'s)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
capriciously in ordering therapeutic visitation between petitioner and the children. See NRS 34.320; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; see also Clark Cnty. Dist. Attorney v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 123 Nev. 337, 346, 167 P.3d 922, 928 (2007) (noting that the child's best interest is the primary focus in placement decisions). Accordingly, we deny this writ petition. See Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (stating that a petition for extraordinary writ relief is purely discretionary with this court). It is so ORDERED.
Parraguirre
cc: Hon. Frank P. Sullivan, District Judge, Family Court Division Aaron Grigsby Christopher R. Tilman Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP/Las Vegas Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 19(17A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
U. v. Dist. Ct. (State Dep't of Family Serv.'s), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/u-v-dist-ct-state-dept-of-family-servs-nev-2015.