U. S. Leasing & Holding Co. v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

158 A.D. 875
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 158 A.D. 875 (U. S. Leasing & Holding Co. v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
U. S. Leasing & Holding Co. v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 158 A.D. 875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff neither alleged nor proved that the railroad was operated negligently or unreasonably. There is no finding of negligent or unreasonable use. The case is almost identical with Friedman v. N. Y. & Harlem R. R. Co. (89 App. Div. 38; affd., 180 N. Y. 550). (See, also, McCarty v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 189 N. Y. 40.) The judgment should be reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs. Present— Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with cost 3. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ball v. . N.Y.C.R.R. Co.
127 N.E. 493 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)
Ball v. New York Central Railroad
229 N.Y. 33 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 A.D. 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/u-s-leasing-holding-co-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1913.