U. S. Leasing & Holding Co. v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
Opinion
The plaintiff neither alleged nor proved that the railroad was operated negligently or unreasonably. There is no finding of negligent or unreasonable use. The case is almost identical with Friedman v. N. Y. & Harlem R. R. Co. (89 App. Div. 38; affd., 180 N. Y. 550). (See, also, McCarty v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 189 N. Y. 40.) The judgment should be reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs. Present— Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with cost 3. Order to be settled on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
158 A.D. 875 (U. S. Leasing & Holding Co. v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.