U. S. Leasing & Holding Co. v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

158 A.D. 875
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1913·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff neither alleged nor proved that the railroad was operated negligently or unreasonably. There is no finding of negligent or unreasonable use. The case is almost identical with Friedman v. N. Y. & Harlem R. R. Co. (89 App. Div. 38; affd., 180 N. Y. 550). (See, also, McCarty v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 189 N. Y. 40.) The judgment should be reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs. Present— Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with cost 3. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

U. S. Leasing & Holding Co. v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 158 A.D. 875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

158 A.D. 875 (U. S. Leasing & Holding Co. v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ball v. . N.Y.C.R.R. Co.
127 N.E. 493 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)
Ball v. New York Central Railroad
229 N.Y. 33 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)