U. S. Asiatic Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

U. S. Asiatic Co. v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 840, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1238

United States Customs Court·Decided December 29, 1966·No. No. P66/387·Published

Opinion

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “D” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), and that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar iu all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “D” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), and that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar iu all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

U. S. Asiatic Co. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 840, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1238 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

57 Cust. Ct. 840 (U. S. Asiatic Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related