U. S.-Asiatic Co. v. United States
40 Cust. Ct. 542
United States Customs Court·Decided May 6, 1958·No. No. 61897; protest 230859-K (C) (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
At the trial, the entry, invoice, and collector’s letter of transmittal were received in evidence, and it was stipulated that the factsfset forth therein were true and correct. The protest was limited to item No. 449 on [543]*543invoice No. 3, described as “Large donkey planter.” An examination of the collector’s report showing that he would not object to the claim of the plaintiff, the protest was sustained as to said item.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
U. S.-Asiatic Co. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 542 (cusc 1958).
40 Cust. Ct. 542 (U. S.-Asiatic Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.