U S 1-163rd Street Corp. v. Gerardo

189 So. 2d 506, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4777
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 9, 1966·No. No. 65-1029·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal we are called upon to review a summary final decree of foreclosure entered in favor of the appellee, plaintiff in the trial court.

To the complaint for foreclosure, the defendant filed a general denial answer. Subsequent to taking the deposition of the principal officer of the mortgagor, the plaintiff filed a motion to strike the answer as sham and for entry of a summary final decree. Upon the decree being rendered, this appeal ensued. We find no error and affirm. See: Rule 1.14(a), Florida Rules of. Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A.; Fink v. Powsner, Fla.App.1958, 108 So.2d 324; McNutt v. Sherrill, Fla.App.1962, 141 So.2d 309; Wingreen Company v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 408; Feng Yeat Chow v. Shaughnessy, S.D.N.Y. 1957, 151 F.Supp. 23.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

U S 1-163rd Street Corp. v. Gerardo, 189 So. 2d 506, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4777 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

189 So. 2d 506 (U S 1-163rd Street Corp. v. Gerardo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Feng Yeat Chow v. Shaughnessy
151 F. Supp. 23 (S.D. New York, 1957)
Wingreen Company v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
171 So. 2d 408 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Fink v. Powsner
108 So. 2d 324 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
McNutt v. Sherrill
141 So. 2d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)