U-Haul Co. v. Hernandez
895 So. 2d 1281, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3558, 2005 WL 602691
This text of 895 So. 2d 1281 (U-Haul Co. v. Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
U-Haul Co. v. Hernandez, 895 So. 2d 1281, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3558, 2005 WL 602691 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
Opinion
The order granting a new trial is affirmed. Brown v. Estate of Stuckey, 749 So.2d 490 (Fla.1999); Franklin v. Public Health Trust, 759 So.2d 703 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Gonzalez v. Ravirifici, 745 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The cause is remanded for a new trial on all issues of damages, including the issue of permanency.
Affirmed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brown v. Estate of Stuckey
749 So. 2d 490 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Franklin v. Public Health Trust
759 So. 2d 703 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Gonzalez v. Ravirifici
745 So. 2d 1145 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
895 So. 2d 1281, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3558, 2005 WL 602691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/u-haul-co-v-hernandez-fladistctapp-2005.