U-Haul Co. of California, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

D.C. Circuit

U-Haul Co. of California, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

255 F. App'x 527

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 13, 2007

DocketNos. 06-1208, 06-1290, 06-1314

StatusPublished

This text of 255 F. App'x 527 (U-Haul Co. of California, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

U-Haul Co. of California, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 255 F. App'x 527 (D.C. Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

This appeal was considered on the record from the National Labor Relations Board and on the briefs of the parties. On an uncontested motion of one of the parties, the Court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for oral argument. See D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petitions for review be denied and the Board’s application for enforcement be granted.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

This appeal was considered on the record from the National Labor Relations Board and on the briefs of the parties. On an uncontested motion of one of the parties, the Court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for oral argument. See D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petitions for review be denied and the Board’s application for enforcement be granted.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 F. App'x 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/u-haul-co-of-california-inc-v-national-labor-relations-board-cadc-2007.