U. E. R. M. W. v. Sherman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

U. E. R. M. W. v. Sherman

41 A.2d 860, 352 Pa. 133, 1945 Pa. LEXIS 401

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 21, 1945

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 41 A.2d 860 (U. E. R. M. W. v. Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

U. E. R. M. W. v. Sherman, 41 A.2d 860, 352 Pa. 133, 1945 Pa. LEXIS 401 (Pa. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendants having taken an appeal within the five-day period following the granting of the preliminary injunction by the court below in the above-entitled matter on affidavits filed by the plaintiff, ex parte, and having *Page 134 thus rendered impossible the hearing fixed by the court pursuant to Equity Rule No. 38, the appeal is dismissed as premature and the matter returned to the court below in order that a hearing, as contemplated by the Equity Rules, may be had forthwith; costs to be paid by appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendants having taken an appeal within the five-day period following the granting of the preliminary injunction by the court below in the above-entitled matter on affidavits filed by the plaintiff, ex parte, and having *Page 134 thus rendered impossible the hearing fixed by the court pursuant to Equity Rule No. 38, the appeal is dismissed as premature and the matter returned to the court below in order that a hearing, as contemplated by the Equity Rules, may be had forthwith; costs to be paid by appellants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.2d 860, 352 Pa. 133, 1945 Pa. LEXIS 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/u-e-r-m-w-v-sherman-pa-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack