Tzynder v. Edelsburg
This text of Tzynder v. Edelsburg (Tzynder v. Edelsburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 27, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D15-671 Lower Tribunal No. 09-4952 ________________
Iehuda Tzynder, Appellant,
vs.
Keren Edelsburg, Appellee.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, George A. Sarduy, Judge.
Nancy A. Hass (Hollywood), for appellant.
Kahn, Lewen & Resnik and Greg A. Lewen and Marcy S. Resnik (Dania), for appellee.
Before WELLS, ROTHENBERG and EMAS, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Appellant Iehuda Tzynder appeals from a final judgment modifying parental
responsibility and timesharing. We affirm the final judgment in all respects, save
one: the final judgment modifies Tzynder’s timesharing with the minor child by
restricting contact to one time per week, and requires that all contact with and
access to the minor child be in a supervised setting. However, the final judgment
fails to identify what steps Tzynder must take in order to reestablish unsupervised
timesharing. On remand, the trial court shall amend the final judgment to identify
the necessary steps which Tzynder must take in order to reestablish unsupervised
timesharing with the parties’ minor child. See Hunter v. Hunter, 540 So. 2d 235
(Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Perez v. Fay, 160 So. 3d 459 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tzynder v. Edelsburg, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tzynder-v-edelsburg-fladistctapp-2016.