Tzynder v. Edelsburg

184 So. 3d 583, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1004, 2016 WL 313863
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 27, 2016·No. No. 3D15-671·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Iehuda Tzynder áppeals from a final judgment modifying parental responsibility and timesharing. We affirm the final judgment in all' respects,, save one: the final judgment modifies Tzyn-der’s timesharing with the' minor child by restricting contact to one time per week, and requires that all contact with and access to the minor child be in a supervised setting. However, the final judgment fails to identify what steps Tzynder must take in order to reestablish unsupervised time-sharing. On remand, the trial court shall amend the final judgment to identify the necessary steps which Tzynder must take in order to reestablish unsupervised time-sharing with the parties’ minor child. See Hunter v. Hunter, 540 So.2d 235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Perez v. Fay, 160 So.3d 459 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tzynder v. Edelsburg, 184 So. 3d 583, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1004, 2016 WL 313863 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

184 So. 3d 583 (Tzynder v. Edelsburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

C.N. v. I.G.C.
Supreme Court of Florida, 2021
Solomon v. Vasquez Solomon
251 So. 3d 244 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)