Tyus Anson Dudley v. State
This text of Tyus Anson Dudley v. State (Tyus Anson Dudley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 12-06-00224-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
TYUS DUDLEY, § APPEAL FROM THE 241ST
APPELLANT
V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant pleaded guilty to the offense of evading arrest or detention. The trial court assessed punishment at confinement for twelve months. We have received the trial court’s certification showing that this is a plea bargain case and that Appellant has no right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2. Appellant states in his notice of appeal that he wishes to assert ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal. However, the clerk’s record shows that Appellant pleaded guilty and that the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by Appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(2). Therefore, Appellant may appeal only those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(2)(A), (B). Appellant has not satisfied either criterion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Opinion delivered July 5, 2006.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J. and Griffith, J.
(DO NOT PUBLISH)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tyus Anson Dudley v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyus-anson-dudley-v-state-texapp-2006.