Tytler v. Palm Beach County School Board
This text of 743 So. 2d 1209 (Tytler v. Palm Beach County School Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the order dismissing appellant’s complaint with prejudice. The collective bargaining agreement did not make binding arbitration mandatory. See, e.g., Sublett v. District Sch. Bd. of Sumter County, 617 So.2d 374, 377 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). Moreover, the administrative process could not provide appellant with the remedy sought in the complaint, money damages. See, e.g., Berkowitz v. City of Tamarac, 654 So.2d 982, 983 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). The availability of qualified immunity as a defense in this case should have been decided on summary judgment, not on a motion to dismiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
743 So. 2d 1209, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14838, 1999 WL 1016274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tytler-v-palm-beach-county-school-board-fladistctapp-1999.