Tyson v. Tyson

604 So. 2d 353, 1992 Ala. LEXIS 976, 1992 WL 201019
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedAugust 21, 1992
Docket1911543
StatusPublished

This text of 604 So. 2d 353 (Tyson v. Tyson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tyson v. Tyson, 604 So. 2d 353, 1992 Ala. LEXIS 976, 1992 WL 201019 (Ala. 1992).

Opinion

KENNEDY, Justice.

Louis Tyson appeals from a judgment of the trial court fixing the compensation due him as temporary executor of the estate of Shelly J. Tyson at $2500.

The trial court heard ore tenus evidence on this matter. The evidence was conflicting both as to the extent of special or extraordinary services rendered by Tyson and as to the value of the estate.

There was evidence that Tyson rendered no extraordinary or special services and that the value of the estate was $50,000.

In addition, at trial Tyson offered no documentation of out-of-pocket expenses, which he also claimed. Although the trial court requested that he tender such documentation and Tyson promised to do so, the record contains no such documentation.

Based on Ala.Code 1975, § 43-2-680, and on the ore tenus rule, see Bridges v. Bridges, 567 So.2d 280, 282 (Ala.1990), we hold that the trial court could have properly fixed Tyson’s compensation at $2500.

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES and HOUSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bridges v. Bridges
567 So. 2d 280 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
604 So. 2d 353, 1992 Ala. LEXIS 976, 1992 WL 201019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyson-v-tyson-ala-1992.