Tyson v. Spearman
This text of 174 So. 269 (Tyson v. Spearman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We granted a writ of certiorari in this case to review the ruling of the lower court allowing the plaintiffs the right to take the testimony of two nonresident defendants under cross-examination, out of court, before the trial of the case, and suspended further proceedings on a writ of prohibition, pending our determination of the issues involved. Subsequent thereto the plaintiff, in order to expedite the trial of the case, filed a motion to withdraw their application to cross-examine the defendants and requested the district court to revoke its order granting the motion, which was done.
It therefore follows that the complaint filed by the applicants for writs no -longer exists and is now a moot question, which this court is not required to answef.
For the reasons assigned, the writs herein issued are recalled and defendants’ application is denied, at their cost.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 So. 269, 187 La. 223, 1937 La. LEXIS 1160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyson-v-spearman-la-1937.