Tyson v. Rittenhouse

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Tyson v. Rittenhouse

40 A. 476, 186 Pa. 137, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 969

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 16, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 411·Published·Cited by 22 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The question of jurisdiction, presented by this appeal from the decree of the court below sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the bill at plaintiff’s costs, appears to have been carefully considered and correctly decided. We have no doubt as [145] to tlie correctness of the conclusion reached by the learned president of the common pleas, and finding nothing in the record that requires special notice the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The question of jurisdiction, presented by this appeal from the decree of the court below sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the bill at plaintiff’s costs, appears to have been carefully considered and correctly decided. We have no doubt as [145] to tlie correctness of the conclusion reached by the learned president of the common pleas, and finding nothing in the record that requires special notice the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Tyson v. Rittenhouse, 40 A. 476, 186 Pa. 137, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 969 (Pa. 1898).

Pincite

40 A. 476 (Tyson v. Rittenhouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related