Tyson v. Rittenhouse

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Tyson v. Rittenhouse

40 A. 476, 186 Pa. 137, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 969

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 16, 1898

DocketAppeal, No. 411

StatusPublished

Cited by22 cases

This text of 40 A. 476 (Tyson v. Rittenhouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tyson v. Rittenhouse, 40 A. 476, 186 Pa. 137, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 969 (Pa. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The question of jurisdiction, presented by this appeal from the decree of the court below sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the bill at plaintiff’s costs, appears to have been carefully considered and correctly decided. We have no doubt as [145]*145to tlie correctness of the conclusion reached by the learned president of the common pleas, and finding nothing in the record that requires special notice the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The question of jurisdiction, presented by this appeal from the decree of the court below sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the bill at plaintiff’s costs, appears to have been carefully considered and correctly decided. We have no doubt as [145]*145to tlie correctness of the conclusion reached by the learned president of the common pleas, and finding nothing in the record that requires special notice the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A. 476, 186 Pa. 137, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyson-v-rittenhouse-pa-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack