Tyson v. Odom

116 S.E. 316, 155 Ga. 320, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 57
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 1923
DocketNo. 3235
StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E. 316 (Tyson v. Odom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tyson v. Odom, 116 S.E. 316, 155 Ga. 320, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 57 (Ga. 1923).

Opinion

1’er Curiam.

The court did not err in • sustaining the demurrer to the intervention filed by the plaintiff in error.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. W. I. Geer, for plaintiff in error. Milner & Farlcas, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 S.E. 316, 155 Ga. 320, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyson-v-odom-ga-1923.