Tyson v. Nazarian

982 N.E.2d 614, 20 N.Y.3d 967
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 18, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 982 N.E.2d 614 (Tyson v. Nazarian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tyson v. Nazarian, 982 N.E.2d 614, 20 N.Y.3d 967 (N.Y. 2012).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment and remitting to the Appellate Division for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum, and, as so modified, affirmed.

Sufficient record evidence exists to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether plaintiff suffered a “serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 957 [1992]). In view of its disposition, the Appellate Division did not address plaintiff’s contention that she is entitled to summary judgment on the issue of defendant’s negligence. We therefore remit for that purpose.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order modified, without costs, by denying defendant’s motion for summary [969]*969judgment and remitting to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LINNANE, KAREN M. v. SZABO, LAJOS
111 A.D.3d 1304 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
982 N.E.2d 614, 20 N.Y.3d 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyson-v-nazarian-ny-2012.