Tyson v. M'Gill

15 La. 145
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 15, 1840
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 15 La. 145 (Tyson v. M'Gill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tyson v. M'Gill, 15 La. 145 (La. 1840).

Opinion

Bullard, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action against the maker of two promissory notes due, the one on the 12th of May, and the other on the 12th of August, 1834; and the plaintiff is appellant from a judgment sustaining the plea of prescription. The suit was brought in October, 1839. In whatever place the defendant may have resided, the prescription of five years runs in his favor, even against minors and perspns interdicted. Articles 3505, 3506 of the Louisiana Code. The conditional offer made by the defendant, in a conversation with the plaintiff’s counsel, does not, in our opinion, amount to á new promise, which entitles the plaintiff to recover.

The judgment of the Commercial Court, is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey v. Porter-Wadley Lumber Co.
28 F. Supp. 25 (W.D. Louisiana, 1939)
La Del Oil Properties, Inc. v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.
126 So. 684 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1930)
Rabel v. Pourciau
20 La. 131 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1868)
McMasters v. Mather
4 La. Ann. 418 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1849)
Garland v. Holmes
1 La. Ann. 404 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1846)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 La. 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyson-v-mgill-la-1840.