Tyson v. Joseph H. Bauland Co.

89 N.Y.S. 1118

This text of 89 N.Y.S. 1118 (Tyson v. Joseph H. Bauland Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tyson v. Joseph H. Bauland Co., 89 N.Y.S. 1118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We think that the record on the appeal should contain only the evidence which was received against the sole appellant. The order refusing to resettle the case is accordingly reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the proceedings remitted to the justice by whom the case was tried for resettlement in accordance with this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 N.Y.S. 1118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyson-v-joseph-h-bauland-co-nyappdiv-1904.