Tyson v. Haft

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tyson v. Haft

70 A.D.2d 821, 417 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12376

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 19, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.D.2d 821 (Tyson v. Haft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tyson v. Haft, 70 A.D.2d 821, 417 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— Application in this article 78 proceeding for a judgment directing dismissal of the indictment and prohibiting any further proceedings against petitioner unanimously denied and the petition dismissed as moot, without costs or disbursements. This is an article 78 proceeding to prohibit respondents Justice Haft and the District Attorney of New York County from conducting further proceedings against defendant and direct[822]*822ing dismissal of Indictment No. 4730/78 for failure to give defendant notice of the Grand Jury proceedings in accordance with CPL 190.50 (subd 5). It now appears that on May 14, 1979 petitioner appeared in New York County, Supreme Court, and was arraigned on superseding Indictment No. SN 1739/ 79 and Indictment No. SN 4730/78 was dismissed. Accordingly, petitioner’s application for an order pursuant to article 78 is moot. Concur — Birns, J. P., Fein, Sandler and Silverman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Application in this article 78 proceeding for a judgment directing dismissal of the indictment and prohibiting any further proceedings against petitioner unanimously denied and the petition dismissed as moot, without costs or disbursements. This is an article 78 proceeding to prohibit respondents Justice Haft and the District Attorney of New York County from conducting further proceedings against defendant and direct[822]*822ing dismissal of Indictment No. 4730/78 for failure to give defendant notice of the Grand Jury proceedings in accordance with CPL 190.50 (subd 5). It now appears that on May 14, 1979 petitioner appeared in New York County, Supreme Court, and was arraigned on superseding Indictment No. SN 1739/ 79 and Indictment No. SN 4730/78 was dismissed. Accordingly, petitioner’s application for an order pursuant to article 78 is moot. Concur — Birns, J. P., Fein, Sandler and Silverman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 821, 417 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyson-v-haft-nyappdiv-1979.