Tyson v. Eagleton

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tyson v. Eagleton. Read the opinion of the Court — 268 F. App'x 261
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 6, 2008·No. 07-7435·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7435

CHARLES TYSON, a/k/a Charles Kevin Bruce Tyson,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN WILLIE L. EAGLETON, of Evans Correctional Institution; DIRECTOR JON E. OZMINT; SHARON PATTERSON, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; ETHEL REDFERN, Grievance Coordinator,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (6:06-cv-01686-PMD)

Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 6, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Tyson, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Jonathan Bridgmon, Ruskin C. Foster, MCCUTCHEN, BLANTON, JOHNSON & BARNETTE, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Tyson appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Tyson v.

Eagleton, No. 6:06-cv-01686-PMD (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tyson v. Eagleton, (4th Cir. 2008).

Tyson v. Eagleton (Tyson v. Eagleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related