Tyson v. City of St. Louis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Tyson v. City of St. Louis

510 S.W.3d 897, 2017 WL 676724

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 21, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104210

StatusPublished

This text of 510 S.W.3d 897 (Tyson v. City of St. Louis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tyson v. City of St. Louis, 510 S.W.3d 897, 2017 WL 676724 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Catherine S. Tyson (“Plaintiff”) appeals the judgment, entered after a bench trial, finding in favor of the City of St. Louis and Gregory F.X. Daly, in his official capacity as Collector of Revenue for the City of St. Louis, on Plaintiffs petition for declaratory judgment. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Catherine S. Tyson (“Plaintiff”) appeals the judgment, entered after a bench trial, finding in favor of the City of St. Louis and Gregory F.X. Daly, in his official capacity as Collector of Revenue for the City of St. Louis, on Plaintiffs petition for declaratory judgment. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

510 S.W.3d 897, 2017 WL 676724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyson-v-city-of-st-louis-moctapp-2017.