Tyson v. City of St. Louis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Tyson v. City of St. Louis

510 S.W.3d 897, 2017 WL 676724

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 21, 2017·No. No. ED 104210·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Catherine S. Tyson (“Plaintiff”) appeals the judgment, entered after a bench trial, finding in favor of the City of St. Louis and Gregory F.X. Daly, in his official capacity as Collector of Revenue for the City of St. Louis, on Plaintiffs petition for declaratory judgment. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Catherine S. Tyson (“Plaintiff”) appeals the judgment, entered after a bench trial, finding in favor of the City of St. Louis and Gregory F.X. Daly, in his official capacity as Collector of Revenue for the City of St. Louis, on Plaintiffs petition for declaratory judgment. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Tyson v. City of St. Louis, 510 S.W.3d 897, 2017 WL 676724 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

510 S.W.3d 897 (Tyson v. City of St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.