Tysheona Smith v. State - corrected 5/11/18

247 So. 3d 77

• Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
• Decided: May 7, 2018
• Docket: 5D18-1468
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

TYSHEONA SMITH,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D18-1468 CORRECTED

STATE OF FLORIDA AND CORNITA A. RILEY, AS CHIEF OF ORANGE COUNTY CORRECTIONS

Respondents.

__________________________________/

Opinion filed May 11, 2018

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Robert Wesley, Public Defender, and Samantha E. Habermehl, Assistant Public Defender, Orlando, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent, State of Florida.

No Appearance for other Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Tysheona Smith, an incompetent defendant, petitions for a writ of habeas corpus

seeking immediate release from the Orange County jail. Because the trial court had no

basis to order Petitioner detained until it could make a determination as to whether Smith

qualified for involuntary commitment, we grant the petition. In October 2017, Smith was charged with possession of cocaine and possession of

drug paraphernalia. She was evaluated for competency by three experts between October

2017 and January 2018. Each concluded that she was incompetent. Thereafter, on February

16, 2018, Smith was adjudicated incompetent to proceed and placed on conditional release.

On April 24, 2018, Petitioner was arrested again and charged with possession of

cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia. On May 7, 2018, the trial court adjudicated

Smith incompetent to proceed based on the prior adjudication and denied conditional release.

The court then ordered two of the experts that had already examined Smith to reexamine her

for the purpose of determining whether she meets the criteria for involuntary hospitalization.

"[W]here. . . a defendant has been found incompetent to proceed and is then released

upon conditions and commits a new offense, section 916.17(2)[,Florida Statutes,] leaves the

trial judge with only two options: modify the conditions of release or involuntarily commit the

defendant to DCFS for treatment." Douse v. State, 930 So. 2d 838, 839 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006);

accord Paolercio v. State, 129 So. 3d 1174, 1175-76 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (citing Douse, 930

So. 2d at 839). Here, because there was insufficient evidence at the time Smith was detained

for the trial court to find that she qualified for involuntary commitment, the only other option

was to release her with the appropriate conditions. See § 916.13(1), Fla. Stat. (2017).

Therefore, we grant the petition and direct the trial court to hold an immediate hearing

to determine whether Smith’s release conditions should be modified or remain the same. If

the experts have already completed the reexaminations and rendered reports, the trial court

should hold an immediate hearing to make the appropriate determination under section

916.17(2).

PETITION GRANTED.

SAWAYA, BERGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.