Tyrone Woods v. United States

397 F.2d 156, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6492
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 18, 1968
Docket21757
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 397 F.2d 156 (Tyrone Woods v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tyrone Woods v. United States, 397 F.2d 156, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6492 (9th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Woods was convicted on one count for bank robbery, and he appeals.

He claims the teachings of Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), were not followed when he was apprehended. Taken all together, we find the record does not support Woods but supports the government.

Also, he complains of the absence of counsel when a fingerprint exemplar was taken from him. Gilbert v. State of California, 388 U.S. 263, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967), (handwriting exemplars), clearly should apply here.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ridling
350 F. Supp. 90 (E.D. Michigan, 1972)
Hill v. State
1972 OK CR 211 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1972)
United States v. William De Palma
414 F.2d 394 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
397 F.2d 156, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyrone-woods-v-united-states-ca9-1968.