Tyrone Woods v. United States
This text of 397 F.2d 156 (Tyrone Woods v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Woods was convicted on one count for bank robbery, and he appeals.
He claims the teachings of Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), were not followed when he was apprehended. Taken all together, we find the record does not support Woods but supports the government.
Also, he complains of the absence of counsel when a fingerprint exemplar was taken from him. Gilbert v. State of California, 388 U.S. 263, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967), (handwriting exemplars), clearly should apply here.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
397 F.2d 156, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyrone-woods-v-united-states-ca9-1968.