Tyrone Warren v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 5, 2025
Docket5D2024-1505
StatusPublished

This text of Tyrone Warren v. State of Florida (Tyrone Warren v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tyrone Warren v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 5D2024-1505 LT Case No. 2021-CF-1111 _____________________________

TYRONE WARREN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County. Cary F. Rada, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Judson Searcy, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

December 5, 2025

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence. We remand only for correction of scrivener’s errors in the written sentence.

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Below, Appellant moved to correct sentencing errors pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), arguing his written Judgment and Sentence and Final Judgment Assessing Charges, Costs, and Fines each included a $250 fine and $12.50 surcharge on count 1 that was not orally pronounced at sentencing. The trial court entered an order striking the fine and surcharge and rendered a Second Amended Final Judgment Assessing Charges, Costs, and Fines in which the fine and surcharge were stricken. However, the trial court failed to also amend Appellant’s Judgment and Sentence to remove the fine and surcharge.

We cannot conclude that this error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, we remand for entry of amended sentencing documents striking the discretionary $250 fine and surcharge in accordance with the lower court’s ruling on Appellant’s motion and consistent with the Second Amended Final Judgment Assessing Charges, Costs, and Fines. See Johnson v. State, 354 So. 3d 598, 600 (Fla. 2d DCA 2022).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with instructions.

EISNAUGLE and KILBANE, JJ., concur. EDWARDS, J., concurs in result only.

2 _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tyrone Warren v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyrone-warren-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.